<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/23">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Terme Boxer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description: <br />
The bronze and copper Terme Boxer is a sculpture of a seated boxer. The boxer has an athletic, muscular, toned and glowing body. The hair and beard are curly. The head of the boxer is turned right and the shoulders are hunched. The facial expression of the boxer is one of pain and possibly torment. We know this due to the presence of the pained, anguished, tormented and exhausted expression on the face of the boxer. The pain is also conveyed through the cuts in the face of the boxer. The artist creates these cuts to show the actual cuts that the boxer had gotten whilst boxing. Copper is used in the face to represent blood that gushed out after cuts. The boxer almost appears to be looking up for help. In its current condition, the boxer has hollow eyes. The ears of the boxer appear quite swollen. There is an inscription on the boxer&#039;s left glove that reads &quot;Apollonios Nestoros.&quot; Athletes in ancient Greece competed in the nude and the Terme Boxer is no exception. The boxer does not have any clothes on. The only piece of clothing that the boxer is wearing are gloves for boxing. The gloves are made of leather. The boxer&#039;s legs are spread apart and his arms are resting on his legs for support. The left foot is flat on the stone that the boxer is seated on and the right heel is half on the ground and half raised in the air. The boxer is seated in the nude on a piece of stone which extends forward till the bottom of the boxer&#039;s feet. The bronze has a fairly shine appearance. The bronze accentuates the musculature of the boxer&#039;s body. <br />
<br />
Significance: <br />
Where to start? This is one of the greatest works that I have ever seen. There is such a painful look. Here is a sculpture with a perfect body and yet there is an absolute agony in its face. The facial expression is truly striking. The boxer appears to truly be in a significant amount of pain. This would be the pathos. The viewer can really see and feel the emotion on the boxer&#039;s face. It could also be that the boxer does not any energy left. He is empty. There is no fuel in the tank. He is running on fumes. This is because the viewer is looking at the boxer after the bout. This is unlike Classical sculpture where the viewer is looking at the scene before an event. Instead this is the boxer after an event. Though the boxer has hollow eyes in its current state, originally there were eyes made of ivory and glass paste. Also, the swollen ears of the boxer could be showing the injuries that boxer had received from boxing matches. It is important to recognize and understand that this is a Hellenistic sculpture. This means that this sculpture was made in the very last phase of ancient Greek art. However, the single most important aspect of this sculpture is that it was made using the lost wax casting method. This method allows for the intricate detailing of the beard and hair. As a result of the sculpture being made using the lost wax casting method, the sculpture is hollow and the material does not have a lot of width to it. The Terme Boxer has individualizing features. The sculpture is of a weary and worn down boxer after a boxing match. The boxer&#039;s body shows the wear and tear of the match. There are gashes on the boxer&#039;s face. The energy has been drained out of the boxer. The drained face of the boxer shows us that. All of the the above point to the boxer being a portrait. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Baths of Constantine, Quirinal Hill, Rome]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Hellenistic, ca. 300-50 BCE]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Sai Teja Surapaneni]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[&quot;Apollonius, Seated Boxer.&quot; Khan Academy. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Mar. 2017.<br />
<br />
&quot;Poem for a Boxer at Rest.&quot; The Getty Iris. N.p., 05 Jan. 2017. Web. 07 Mar. 2017.<br />
<br />
&quot;The Boxer: An Ancient Masterpiece Comes to the Met.&quot; The Metropolitan Museum of Art, i.e. The Met Museum. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 Mar. 2017.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[140 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Bronze, Copper]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[Palazzo Massimo alle Terme, Rome, Italy]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/24">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Harmodius and Aristogeiton]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
The marble statues “Harmodius and Aristogeiton” consist of two standing, nude male figures. From the perspective of the viewer, the man to the right is Harmodius. His hair is quite stylized and made up of rows of snail shell-like curls. His face is serene and mask-like. He has deep-set almond shaped eyes and a slight archaic smile. Unfortunately, his nose has been mostly broken off so that only the nostrils remain. Aristogeiton’s hair, on the other hand, is much smoother and almost helmet-like. He also has a beard which is quite rough and almost crudely carved. His nose is broken off as well, and he shows additional signs of damage all along his cheeks. His eyes, while deep-set, are a bit rounder than Harmodius’. Both Harmodius and Aristogeiton’s postures are dynamic and full of movement. Unlike their stylized heads, their bodies show evidence of contrapposto. Harmodius’ left arm is raised above his head and he is holding what appears to be the end of a sword, with the blade missing. His right arm is stretched slightly behind him and is held in place by a marble support connected to his leg.  The muscles in his arms and torso are defined and twist along the line of his body. He appears to be lunging forward, with his left knee slightly bent and his right leg stretched behind him. His left hip is leaning on a small tree trunk placed beside him. His right foot is slightly raised, but the marble from the round base slopes upward to remain connected to his foot. Aristogeiton’s body mirrors his counterpart’s position, with his right arm and leg extending forward. His arm, however, is extended in front of him as opposed to above his head. There is a chlamys draped over his arm and he is holding the handle of a sword. There is a tree trunk placed against his right leg and the fabric. Like Harmodius, his back foot is placed on a slight slope in the base, making it appear as though it is raised. <br />
<br />
Significance:<br />
<br />
These sculptures are noteworthy works, as they do not quite fit in either the Archaic Period or the Classical Period. Instead, they include characteristics typical of each of these periods and are emblematic of the transition that occurred at this time. Both Harmodius and Aristogeiton’s heads are archaic in style, though Harmodius’ more so than Aristogeiton’s. Harmodius features the trademark almond shaped eyes, snail shell curls, and archaic smile. Harmodius’ head, however, is not original to the statue. It has been restored based off of a plaster cast of a sculpture of Aristogeion’s head at Baiae. While their heads appear archaic, their bodies are certainly Classical in style. Although they are still a little bit stiffer than most Classical statues, they are much more dynamic than statues dating to the Archaic period. They are standing in a dramatic contrapposto, with their front leg bearing their weight. They have defined musculature that responds to the movement of their body, a common characteristic of Classical sculptures as well. In addition to Aristogeiton’s head, there have been a few other restorations. Aristogeiton’s left hand and right arm were added at the same time as his head. Harmodius’ arms, lower left leg, and right leg were all restored as well. In addition to their style, the subjects of these sculptures are quite interesting. These statues, in particular, are based on Classical bronze originals, which themselves were based on Archaic bronze sculptures. In the Classical originals, there would not have been tree trunks, as those are used to support the added weight of marble. The early Classical originals would have been displayed at the Athenian Agora after the Archaic originals were stolen by the Persians during their attack on Athens in 480 BC. The statues were commissioned by the city of Athens to celebrate Harmodius and Aristogeiton as heroes of the state. The two men planned to kill the tyrant Hippias, and his brother Hipparchos. However, they only managed to kill Hipparchos, and were killed themselves soon after. It also appears that the assassination attempt was over personal matters, not due to Hippias’ tyranny. According to ancient sources, Harmodius may have been romantically pursued by Hipparchos but turned him down in favor of Aristogeiton. Nonetheless, their actions were seen as an attempt to save Athens from tyranny. After Hippias was finally overthrown in 510 BC, they were celebrated as heroes by the Athenians, and the first bronze sculptures were commissioned. Their actions were once again solidified when these statues of the two men were commissioned by the Athenians to replace the bronze originals and set up at public expense. This is the first instance where portraits were set up by a community, rather than the individuals they portrayed. The communal nature of this commission further confirms the figures’ images as heroes to Athenian State as a whole, regardless of actual outcome of their actions.  In fact, Harmodius and Aristogeiton’s legacy has earned them the title of “The Tyrant Slayers” to this day.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Kritios and Nesiotes, original artists]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Copy said to be from Tivoli outside Rome <br />
Original from the Athenian Agora]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Roman copy, unknown date; Greek original ca. 477 BC, Classical ]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Becca Peters]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[Breckenridge, James D. <em>Likeness: a conceptual history of ancient portraiture</em>. Evanston: Northwe stern U Press, 1969. 85-87. Print. Smith, Amy . "Athenian Political Art from the fifth and fourth centuries BCE: Images of Historical Individuals." Athenian Political Art from the fifth and fourth centuries BCE: Images of Historical Individuals. N.p., Jan. 2003. Web. 15 Mar. 2017. &lt;http://www.stoa.org/projects/demos/article_portraits?page=7&amp;greekencoding=&gt;. "Tyrannicides - Aristogeiton." Tyrannicides - Aristogeiton — Sito ufficiale del Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2017. &lt;http://cir.campania.beniculturali.it/museoarcheologiconazionale/thematic-views/image-gallery/RA97/?searchterm=Harmodius and Aristogeiton&gt;. "Tyrannicides - Harmodius." Tyrannicides - Harmodius — Sito ufficiale del Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Mar. 2017. &lt;http://cir.campania.beniculturali.it/museoarcheologiconazionale/thematic-views/image-gallery/RA95/?searchterm=Harmodius and Aristogeiton&gt;.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[220 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble copy of Bronze original ]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[National Archaeological Museum of Naples, Italy ]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/25">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Head of Lysimache]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[<strong>Description:</strong> <br />The head depicted here is that of a older female. It is approximately two-thirds life size and is supported by a bronze rod. She has heavy bags under her eyes, crows feet, and smile lines; additionally, the skin of her neck sags. The eyes are hooded and the mouth is straight. There is heavy damage to her nose, the left ear, and the mouth and some damage to the chin, the left eye, and the left eyebrow. The lobe of the right ear is pierced; this hole has a somewhat large diameter. The hair is stylized symmetrically and is wavy. It is bunched up at the nape of the neck. A plain headband keeps the elaborate hairstyle in place; this was called a <em>strophion</em> at the time.<br /><br /><strong>Significance:</strong> <br />This portrait is significant because the original was a representation of the priestess of Athena. As mentioned in the description, wrinkles are quite prominent on this work; verism is used quite liberally by the artist. Wisdom and legacy are rendered through this depiction of age, as well as realism and individualism in depicting the priestess. Scholars indicate that Lysimache was priestess of Athena for sixty-four years; her lifelong service to Athena was something that the artist rendered through this use of verism. It should be noted that some scholars claim that the Greek original was made of bronze instead of marble.<br />It should be noted that Demetrios of Alopeke, the artist sometimes accredited for this work, was working in an anti-classical way; this can be discerned through the lack of idealization in the face.<br />The hole in her ear was likely home to an earring made of precious stone to indicate status through wealth. Furthermore, her headband was similar to the 3rd century marble portrait of the priestess Aristonoë from Rhamnous, indicating style trends in the Hellenistic period.<br />Although many scholars do believe this head to be that of Lysimache, this assumption is not universal or fact; the figure's identity is debated. Whether or not she represents Lysimache has yet to be proven, hence why some scholars remain skeptical. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown (Sometimes accredited to Demetrios of Alopeke)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Tarquinia, Viterbo (province), Lazio, Italy]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[4th Century BC (date of original), Hellenistic Period ]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Charlotte Myers]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=399937&amp;partId=1">The British Museum </a><br /><br /><br /><span>Breckenridge, James D. </span><em>Likeness</em><span>. 1968. Pages 98-101.</span><br /><br /><span>Dillon, Sheila. </span><em>The female portrait statue in the Greek world</em><span>. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Page 14. <br /><br /><span>Hekler, Antal. </span><em>Greek &amp; Roman Portraits</em><span>. W. Heinemann, 1912. Page X.<br /><br /><span>Keesling, Catherine M. "SYERIS, DIAKONOS OF THE PRIESTESS LYSIMACHE ON THE ATHENIAN ACROPOLIS (IG II2 3464)." </span><em>hesperia</em><span> 81.3 (2012). Page 498.</span><br /></span></span>]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[35.7 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[The British Museum of London, United Kingdom]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/26">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Seated Chrysippos]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
The portrait statue of Chrysippus depicts the Stoic philosopher in a seated position, his back bent over with age.  He sits upon a stone block, tucking his feeble legs closer to his body and pulling his himation tighter around his bare shoulders and sagging chest.  His left hand is balled up into a fist on his lap, which also holds the cloak tightly underneath.  His right hand is free, the fingers bent and extending towards the viewer to indicate numeration.  His head is projecting forward towards an imaginary opponent, and his face portrays that of a man in the middle of a dispute.  More specifically, the head is exquisitely detailed, with sunken eyes, furrowed brows, and several sharp creases at the top of the nose. The dotage prevalent in the Chrysippus statue continues with the figure&#039;s heavily lined eyes and sagging cheeks. His beard is composed of unruly tufts that extend unevenly in different directions.  His head is balding and appears dome-like in shape due to his close-cropped hair style and boney structure.  <br />
<br />
Significance:<br />
The portrait statue of Chrysippus has a number of features that help define the philosophic image of its deceased counterpart: the beard, furrowed brows, tightly drawn himation, and seated posture all hearken back to the philosopher image of the Hellenistic period.  His sagging body and contemplative expression might have been intended by Euboulides to emphasize the portrait as resolutely philosophic.  This blatant disregard for the philosopher’s temporal body suggests that Chrysippus favored intellectual prowess over physical fitness.  However, these few elements alone would not have been enough to connote Chrysippus’ image in antiquity.  More specifically, individualizing features like the gesture of the right hand and energetic thrust of the head are explicit characteristics of Chrysippus.  Chrysippus was more than just an aggressive speaker; he was a great Stoic dialectician who represented argumentation and logical deduction in stoicism (one of the main philosophical &quot;schools&quot; in Athens).  In this case, his extended right hand represents a particular form of thinking, the fingers perhaps ticking off the order of his winning points.  His powerfully expressive face is contrasted with his particularly frail body, which emphasizes how the power of his spirit triumphs over the weakness of his body.  These elements precisely communicate not only the portrait subject’s social standing in society, but also his individualizing features as a philosopher in antiquity.<br />
<br />
It is of some significance to note that the statue is also a combination of two separate sculptures; however, art historians are fairly certain that they have the correct arrangement because Cicero specifically refers to these individualizing features formerly stated.  Another part of what makes the statue of Chrysippus a significant part of history is the change from the “formal” and renowned stance to a more personal stance depicting a man (in this case, a philosopher) frozen in the midst of doing something he was once celebrated throughout antiquity for.  In other words, the viewer gets a rather intimate depiction of an individual as opposed to other Hellenistic portraiture.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Copy after Euboulides (Greek sculptor) ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Athens, Greece]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Hellenistic original, 250 BCE-50 CE; copy, 2nd century CE]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Ryan Tetter]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[The British Museum Website: http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=460098&amp;partId=1 <br /><br />Dillon, Sheila. “Greek Portraits in Practice.” <em>Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture: Contexts, Subjects, and Styles.</em> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 114-115. Print.<br /><br />Harvard University Library Website: http://via.lib.harvard.edu/via/deliver/deepcontentItem?recordId=olvwork295837%2CDIV.LIB.FACULTY%3A828683 <br /><br />Hekler, Antal. <em>Greek &amp; Roman Portraits</em>. Place of Publication Not Identified: Hardpress, 2012. 22. Google Books. Web.<br /><br />Pollitt, J.J. “Personality and Psychology in Portraiture.” <em>Art in the Hellenistic Age.</em>Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2009. 69. Print.
<p>Richter, Gisela M. A. “Criteria for the Identification.” <em>Greek Portraits II: To What Extent Were They Faithful Likenesses?</em> Bruxelles: Latomus, 1959. 34. Print.</p>
Zanker, Paul, and H. A. Shapiro. <em>The Mask of Socrates: The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. </em>Berkeley, CA: CaliforniaUniversity Press, 1996. Print.
<p> </p>]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[Est. 170 cm tall (based on known height of head = 36 cm tall)]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[Head: the British Museum, London, United Kingdom<br />
Body: the Louvre, Paris, France]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/27">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Standing Aeschines]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
Standing Aeschines is a full length statue of the Greek orator Aeschines. The figure stands in contrapposto. He wears strapped sandals on each of his feet called trochodes, commonly worn in the fourth century BC. He is fully covered in drapery, wearing a himation over a tunic. His arms are in a traditional “sling” position: his right arm is bent towards his chest and contained within the drapery. His hand, however, is exposed with his fingers curling around the edge of the garment.  His left arm is bent behind his back, also enveloped in the garment. His himation is fairly taught around his body, and the folds of the garment respond to his contrapposto, accentuating the shape of his belly as well as the bend in his knee. The himation falls onto a container of papyrus rolls called a scrinium which form a support for the body. He wears a tunic or a chiton beneath his himation, which can be seen at the top of his chest. His head is slightly turned to the right. He wears a short beard formed of commas of hair. The hair on his head is also waved and longer on the sides of his head as well as thin and receding at the top, suggesting his age. He has a large nose at the center of his face. The slight contracting of the brow, pointed eyes, and downturned mouth form a pensive expression. <br />
<br />
Significance:<br />
Aeschines was a 4th century Greek orator. We know that the sling pose in which he stands is one he thought highly of because of his comments. He described the sling pose while observing a statue of Solon, stating that this pose represented self control and reserve in a speaker, opposed to wild gesticulation of his contemporary speakers. The artist chose to reproduce him in this pose which he admired and thought to reflect good values. This quality of self control Aeschines addresses is perhaps a remainder of sophrosyne from the Classical Period. The figure’s pose of restraint and modesty would have reminded viewers of the good citizen in Classical Athens. The individualizing traits in the sculpture are characteristic of the Late Classical period, and foreshadow the careful attention to detail of Hellenistic sculpture. His thinning hair and large nose set this sculpture apart from the mask-like Classical figures which minimize rather than highlight individualizing traits. The sculpture was found at the Villa of the Papyri at Herculaneum, a sprawling private residence where over 41 portraits were found. This is an exciting case in which we can understand the display context of this Roman copy. The statue was found in the northeast corner of the large garden of the residence, and would have been the one of the first sculptures seen when entering the garden from the house. Because this sculpture was in an outdoor space, viewers would have engaged with it in a social context.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Between the third and forth columns of the northeast corner of the large garden, Villa of the Papyri, Herculaneum, Naples, Italy. ]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Copy of a Late Classical work ca. Early 4th century BC]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[Breckenridge, James D. "The Portrait in Greek Art." <em>Likeness; a Conceptual History of Ancient Portraiture.</em> Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1968. 107-111. Print. <br /><br />Dillon, Sheila. "Chapter 4: The Appearance of Greek Portraits." <em>Ancient Greek Portrait Sculpture: Contexts, Subjects, and Styles</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2012. 61-63. Print. <br /><br />Mattusch, Carol C., and Henry Lie. "Chapter 4: Marble Sculptures." <em>The Villa Dei Papiri at Herculaneum: Life and Afterlife of a Sculpture Collection</em>. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2005. 143-44. Print.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[200 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[Archaeological Museum of Naples, Italy]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/28">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Standing Aristonoe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
The marble statue of the priestess Aristonoe is life-sized and draped in a himation. The look of the statue is very smooth. The statue has a full head of hair. Aristonoe has beautiful curly hair that is parted in the center and is drawn back. Aristonoe has eyes that seem to look far away as she is standing on her base. The face does remind one of Alexander the Great. There is no tilt but in the head but there is a turn. The statue has an elongated neck. The right hand is missing in its entirety. The hand is missing a few inches after the elbow. There is a hole in the center of the arm. The left hand is held out in a 90 degree angle. The left leg of the statue is bent. The twisting and turning himation on the statue not only covers the entire statue but also adds elements of elegance, style and beauty to the statue. The himation has a sheer quality. The abdomen is visible underneath the himation. There is an inscription on the base of the statue. The inscription states two names, Hierokles the son of the Priestess Aristonoe, who commissioned the statue. <br />
<br />
Significance: <br />
The statue of Aristonoe was found at the Little Temple in Rhamnus. The temple was dedicated to Nemesis and Themis. What makes this statue remarkable is that it exists in its entirety, for the most part. The head, torso, most of the limbs and inscription are all present. The inscription states that this is the priestess Aristonoe and that her son Hierokles had this statue created in her honor. Originally, the missing right hand was &quot;pouring a libation.&quot; Scholars believe that the right hand was holding a phiale, from which a &#039;libation would be poured.&#039; Women at this time did not have highly individualistic statues created of them. Instead statues of females were idealized. The only statues of females that were created were those of upper socio-economic status. These women were deemed important only according to their familial roles. This meant that the identity of these women was entirely made up of who they were related. That is whose child they were, whose spouse they were and whose parent they were. That is all. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Little Temple at Rhamnus. Attica, Greece]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Hellenistic. ca. BCE 3rd Cent-2nd Cent]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Sai Teja Surapaneni]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA["Archaeology in Greece. 1890-91." <em>The Journal of Hellenic Studies</em> 12 (1891): 385-397. Jstor. Web. <br /><br /><em>The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome</em>. Vol. 1. N.p.: Oxford U Press, 2010. 451. Books.google.com. Web. <br /><br />"Summaries Of Periodicals." <em>The American Journal Of Archaeology And Of The History Of The Fine Arts</em> VII (1891): n. pag. Books.google.com. Web. <br /><br />Ma, John. <em>Statues and Cities: Honorific Portraits and Civic Identity in the Hellenistic World.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 166. Books.google.com. Web. <br /><br />James, Sharon L., and Sheila Dillon, eds. <em>A Companion To Women In The Ancient World</em>. N.p.: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Incorporated, 2012. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World Ser.. 5100q, 5100r, 5100s. ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. <br /><br />Dillon, Sheila. <em>The Female Portrait Statue In The Greek World</em>. New York: Cambridge U Press, 2010. 106-108. Books.google.com. Web. <br /><br />Dillon, Sheila. "Female Portraiture in the Hellenistic World." <em>A Companion To Women In The Ancient World</em>. N.p.: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd, n.d. 272-273. Books.google.com. Web. <br /><br />"The Priestess in the Sanctuary: Implements, Portraits, and Patronage." <em>Portrait of a Priestess: Women and Ritual in Ancient Greece</em>. Princeton: Princeton U Press, 2007. 146. Print.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[162 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[National Archaeological Museum. Athens, Greece]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/29">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Tusculum Caesar]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description<br />
<br />
The Tusculum Caesar is a head, broken at the base of the neck. The left side of the head is protruding outward. The portrait depicts a receding hairline, where there is only enough hair on the very top of his head to still connect the rest of his hair. He also has wrinkles on his forehead. His eyebrows are close together, almost like they are furrowed, which creates a ridge connecting them, along with open eyes below them. He also has a long, narrow, triangle shaped nose, with a rounded tip. He is a skinny man and you can see the outline of his skull. He has sunken cheeks, and you can slightly see his cheekbones. Along with the sunken cheeks, you can see that there is also sagging skin present. You can see a pair of laugh lines as well, the right one is slightly higher than the left. There is also a slight smile present. Another thing to mention is that one can see wrinkles on the bust’s neck. One more thing to note is that the bust’s neck is somewhat curved on the left side. <br />
<br />
Significance <br />
<br />
This bust of Caesar is crafted in the “verisitic” style, meaning it shows the imperfections one might have, rather than idealizing their image. This can be seen in a number of instances. The wrinkles on his forehead, the sagging skin, the laugh lines, and the receding hairline all represent age. This bust was not crafted when Caesar was a young man. His head being broken at the base of the neck also indicates that this bust was a part of a larger sculpture. This could also explain the slight curve in his neck, he might have had a certain position or posture as an entire statue. The asymmetry of the laugh lines is an indicator of the realism to this portrait. This is because the artist did not choose to simply make the laugh lines symmetrical, the discrepancy shows that the artist is most likely trying to go for as much of a likeness to Caesar as he can. The abnormal shape to Caesars head also indicates the high chance that the sculptor is trying to be as accurate as he can. Caesar was known for have a skull deformity and this further supports that, it also plays into the artist’s “veristic” approach to this sculpture. However, despite his age being shown, the way his eyes are open, and alert, and his mouth has that slight smile, is an indication that the artist is in no way trying to make Caesar look weak, frail, or sick. The strength in his face can be seen as an idealism among the lack there of, but also as a sign of respect from the artist.  <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Tusculum, Italy]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[50-40 BC]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Soe Naing ]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[<span>Getty Museum , J. Paul . </span><em>Ancient Portraits in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Volume 1</em><span>. N.p.: n.p., 1987. Print. </span><span>Page 27<br /><br />https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1206/1206.4866.pdf<br /><br />http://dla.library.upenn.edu/dla/fisher/record.html?id=FISHER_n2001080965<br /></span>]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[33 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble ]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[Museo d&#039;Antichità, collezione del Castello Reale di Agliè, in Torino]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/30">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Delos Pseudo-Athlete]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
The Delos Pseudo-Athlete is a male nude figure, and stands at over life size, at 2.25 meters. His hairline is receding, showing little evidence of hair carved into the marble, almost appearing bald. The forehead protrudes significantly over his eyes, which are sunken into the eye sockets. His nose is jaggedly chipped off, leaving a jagged plane of marble in the center of his face. His mouth is taught and small, surrounded by smile lines. His temples stick out slightly, making his head appear wider at the top. His ears are larger than normal, and are angled forward instead of laying flat against his head. His neck is thick and muscular, leading into his chiseled collarbone. His pectoral and abdominal muscles are pronounced; his midsection is thick and muscular. His toned arms hang at his sides; his left arm rests parallel to his body, with his hand lightly touching his thigh. His right arm is bent, with his hand resting on his right hip. He has a draped piece of cloth that rests on his right shoulder, extends down and across his back, and wrapped around his right hand. The excess cloth hangs at his side, reaching to beyond his knees. His legs are thick and toned, with sharply defined calves. He is standing in contraposto. His left leg is bearing the majority of his weight, while his right leg is bent and pointed behind him. He is semi-leaning against a small tree trunk that is less than half his height. <br />
<br />
Significance: <br />
This piece, found on the private residence of the House of Diadoumenos on the island of Delos, is an exemplary display of the combination of Greek and Roman portrait styles. The name, “Pseudo-Athlete” was given many years later by art historians because of the figure’s older looking head, and youthful body. This figure was most likely a businessman, making it unlikely that he would have been as toned as he is portrayed in this sculpture. During the Late Republican Period, verism became a popular style used to depict the male form. The name literally means “warts and all.” Instead of the Herculean depictions, these veristic forms are shown with definite signs of age. Crows feet, wrinkles, and smile lines were hailed as markers of age and thus an indication of wisdom, a significant Roman value. The head and face of the Delos Pseudo athlete is very veristic; his hair is receding, his ears awkwardly stick out, and his wrinkles are apparent. Along with his evident verism, the Pseudo Athlete shows other Roman qualities. The draped cloth might be a form of a toga, which only Roman citizens could wear. At the same time, his youthful body is a nod to the Hellenistic Greek style of portraiture. He is in contraposto, and is depicted as a heroic nude. He also has an upward glance and a tilted head, a style that is most likely derived from Polykleitos’ depiction of Alexander the Great, one of the most recognizable and influential figures of the Hellenistic Period. This figure shows the combination of values from the Hellenistic Greek period along with the Verism of the Late Republican Period, albeit in a disjointed manner.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[House of Diadoumenos, Delos, Cyclades, Greece]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[Late 2nd - Early 1st century BCE, the Late Republican Period]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Nora Cheung]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[Gisela M. A. Richter. “The Origin of Verism in Roman Portraits.” The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 45, 1955, pp. 39–46., www.jstor.org/stable/298742.<br />
<br />
Stevenson, Tom. “The &#039;Problem&#039; with Nude Honorific Statuary and Portraits in Late Republican and Augustan Rome.” Greece &amp; Rome, vol. 45, no. 1, 1998, pp. 45–69., www.jstor.org/stable/643207.]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[225 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[National Archaeological Museum of Athens, Greece ]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/31">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Portrait of Lucius Vibius and Family]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[<p>Description:</p>

<p>This marble funerary relief sculpture depicts three figures, consisting of an older husband and wife and their young son, who are framed by a rectangular niche with a Latin inscription of bold, capital letters incised at the base. In the foreground, the upper bodies and faces of the man and woman protrude from the surface with their son’s portrait bust hovering behind and in between their frontal forms. On their drapery, the carving appears a bit shallow, as it consists of linear, sometimes jagged folds that create stylized, geometric clothing that flattens the surface somewhat. However, this simplification works in contrast to the detailed, individualized faces, which lack the idealization of Greek portraits, even conveying age. As such, the husband, Lucius Vibius, bears the demeanor of an older man, with jowl lines on his sunken cheeks, skin folds on his neck and lines creasing on his forehead. His V-shaped chin and bulbous head with arched brows, narrow, squinting eyes, protruding ears and long, hooked nose convey a sense of individualism. Similarly, the young boy shares the father’s ear, jaw, and head shape, revealing familial resemblance. But unlike his father, the boy has smoother, youthful features, including a softer brow and shorter nose, as well as curly ringlets that shift direction and extend to his forehead, in contrast to the older man’s receding cropped style. In one sense, the boy’s eyes and slightly curved brow more closely relate to his mother’s eyes, as they are nearly the same distance apart. Aside from that, the woman’s face appears strikingly different than her husband’s and son’s as it includes a squarer jawline and sagging skin along the chin. Her shorter nose and rounder lips seem more feminine, although her curved jowls and sunken eyes dismiss any illusions of idealization. A piece of cloth drapes over her head and hair, which is tousled in the braided <i>nodus </i>style. Her left arm rests horizontally while the other forms a diagonal, the cloth pooling around it and highlighting the ring on the curled hand with a delicate pointer finger that brushes her lower cheek. As if in juxtaposition to these subtle curves, Lucius’ hand extends out of the drapery cascading around his shoulders, offering a firm contrast to his wife’s delicacy.</p>

<p>Significance:</p>

<p>Like many funerary reliefs of the late Republican period, this monument uses visual iconography to express Roman ideals and assert the citizenship of former slaves, who were part of a social class called the <i> libertini.</i> According to the inscription on the bottom, the relief portrays Lucius Vibius, a freeborn man of the Tromentina tribe, his wife, Vecilia Hila, a freedwoman, and their son, Lucius Vibius Felicio Felix. Having once been enslaved and devoid of Roman rights, Vecilia affirms her place in the Roman world as a citizen and Roman matron. Although her husband was freeborn, he could not have married her when she was a slave, so the relief represents their status as a Roman family after her freedom, which had been given by a woman. The couple succeed by depicting themselves as the Roman ideal types—a strong, guiding paterfamilias, in the <i>togatus</i> pose with his hands extended, wearing the <i>toga</i> reserved for citizens, which symbolized Roman public life, and the virtuous<i> matrona</i>, carefully covered in a <i>palla</i> garment and <i>stola</i>, a slip-like cloth, epitomizing the modesty prized in freeborn women. Additionally, her arm position, with one arm horizontal and the other touching her veil, appears to be a return to the Greek-derived <i>pudicitia</i> pose, which exemplifies the same virtue. The two figures together, in frontal position, emphasize the strength and stability of legitimate marriage, which was denied slaves and thus important to freedmen, as further accentuated by the woman’s ring. Proof of the union, their son, a natural born Roman, hovers between them in bust form, as the crowning glory that completes the perfect, mythical Roman family. When closely examined, the family’s features, although individualized in purposeful veristic style on the man and woman and more idealized on the young boy, reflect other notable Roman trends. For instance, the man’s balding head and stern gaze recalls Julius Caesar, while the boy’s hairstyle is distinctly Augustan, and his mother’s hair reflects a variation of the <i>nodus</i> coiffure popularized by Livia, this style including a braided element. These attributes, along with the large letters of the inscription, which appear almost monumental in the view of one scholar, render this former slave and her family as quintessentially Roman, as they sought to be remembered. Oddly enough, one peculiarity of the piece derives from the inscription, which describes a <i>liberta</i> named Vibia Prima, possibly a daughter of Lucius, although she is not depicted. The precise reason for this choice is unknown, but scholars point out that most funerary reliefs include boys solely if children are shown, perhaps due to a Roman preference for males. This sudden depiction of young boys in funerary portraiture likely resulted from a trend that began when Augustus adopted Caius and Lucius Caesar. In fact, the portrait of this boy resembles the classicizing, idealized style used in the Augustan court at the time, which is clearly visible when compared to the head of Lucius Caesar in the Museo Nationale of Naples. Regardless, the relief fulfills its aim, memorializing Lucius Vibius, ‘member of the Tromentina Tribe’, and his family, as Roman citizens.</p>
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[ ca. 13 B.C..- 5 A.D., Late Republican-Early Augustan]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Charlotte Mann]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[<p>Galinsky, Karl. "Semblance and Storytelling in Augustan Rome." <i>The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus.</i> Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2009. 228. Print.</p>

<p>Kleiner, Diana E.E. <i>Roman Group Portraiture: The Funerary Reliefs of the Late Republic and Early Empire. </i>New York: Garland Publ., 1977. 31-32; 51; 108; 111; 113-114; 138; 151; 163; 234-235. Print.</p>

<p>Koortbojian, Michael. "In Commemorationem Mortvorvm." <i>Art and Text in Roman Culture.</i> Ed. JasÌ Elsner. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 214-18. Print.</p>

<p>Rawson, Beryl. <i>A Companion to Families in the Greek and Roman Worlds.</i> Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. N. pag. Print.</p>

<p>Vout, Caroline. "The Funerary Altar of Pedana and the Rhetoric of Unreachability." <i>Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. </i>Ed. Jas Elsner and Michel Meyer. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2014. 294-96. Print.</p>

http://www2.cnr.edu/home/sas/araia/family.html


]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[ 75 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[luna marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[ Museo Chiaramonti, Vatican Musuems, Vatican City, Italy]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://classicalchopped.artinterp.org/omeka/items/show/32">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Head of Pompey the Great]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Description:<br />
<br />
This smooth, veristic, marble sculpture depicts the great Roman general, Pompey. The sculpture is primarily just the head, with a small segment of the neck included. The white marble material shows some signs of age and a few light scuffs, but overall, the piece has been well preserved. The facial features are rendered to look realistic and personalized. Pompey is depicted with a straight forward gaze with a slight curve to the lips. He has a wide round-shaped face that is distinct to his appearance. There are wrinkle lines in his forehead as well as on the sides of his cheeks and chin, showing that he is a middle-aged-man. His hair appears to be shaped and styled similarly to Alexander the Great’s hairstyle but there is still some personalization evident in the change of direction of some of the hair strands. The hair is not quite as long as Alexander the Great’s, but the “lion’s mane” style is still evident. The eyes much smaller and more beady than Alexander the Great’s, and his lips are very thin. <br />
<br />
Significance:<br />
<br />
It is evident that the facial features were intended to reflect what Pompey actually looked like, rather than to idealize his appearance. The wrinkles in the face and the seriousness of the expression display the periods of focus and stress that Pompey was continuously required to endure in order to become such a powerful military leader. This level of verism in this portrait displays the features that the artist chose to emphasize Pompey&#039;s legacy. The similarity in Pompey’s &quot;anastole&quot; hairstyle with Alexander the Great’s stemmed from the fact that he is successor to Alexander’s rule. The lion’s mane hair style displayed that he possessed similar qualities to Alexander the Great and knew what it took to be a great leader. By borrowing elements from portrayals of Alexander, and still keeping individual facial features, Pompey&#039;s image was able to be easily recognized and remembered as a great Roman general, while also maintaining a connection of personal truth with the viewer. The original portrait was set up in Pompey&#039;s theater in the Campus Martius, where it would have been easily accessible. This marble copy was instead placed in the family tomb of Pompey&#039;s Claudian-era descendants where it could only be seen by family members, who came to the tomb to pay respects to the dead.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:source><![CDATA[Rome, Italy, The Licinian Tomb at Porta Pia or on the via Salaria]]></dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[30—50 CE, Claudian]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:contributor><![CDATA[Gentry Pack]]></dcterms:contributor>
    <dcterms:references><![CDATA[Ancient Rome Website: http://ancientrome.ru/art/artworken/img.htm?id=3261<br />
<br />
Encylclopedia Britanica Website:<br />
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pompey-the-Great<br />
<br />
University of Cambridge Website:<br />
http://museum.classics.cam.ac.uk/collections/casts/pompey-gnaeus-pompeius-magnus]]></dcterms:references>
    <dcterms:format><![CDATA[25 cm tall]]></dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:medium><![CDATA[Marble]]></dcterms:medium>
    <dcterms:rightsHolder><![CDATA[Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek in Copenhagen, Denmark]]></dcterms:rightsHolder>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
